THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO VARIATION OF MAINTENANCE ORDER CASE LAW

The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

Blog Article

refers to a landmark case decided because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a very well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.

These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, marketing a more informed and just society.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

The recent amendment to Section 489-F on the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the regulation with contemporary challenges.

Let’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

In any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the list of most serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to ensure justice prevails.

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court while in the United States. Reduce courts around the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that include parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its individual judicial system that involves trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is often referred to given that the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Whilst state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.

So, it was held that the right into a healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and fourteen from the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all these amenities and services that a person is entitled to get pleasure from with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

share or interest of the co-owner more info in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--

Report this page